As Mortgage Rate Spreads Get Narrow, The Difference Between Choosing A Fixed Rate Versus An Adjustable Rate Mortgage Narrows, Too
Posted on July 28, 2005
Filed under On Fixed Vs Adjustable
Read the complete post
Not since 2001 have mortgage rates spreads been as narrow as they are today. The yield curve is starting to look more like a yield ledge.
As of today, rates on 30-year fixed rate mortgages are pricing just 0.375% higher than for a 3-Year ARM.
That has tremendous significance to home buyers and homeowners alike.
For example, one question that helps to define an individual's mortgage planning strategy is: "How long do you plan to stay in this home?". The more narrow the spread is, though, the less relevant this question becomes.
When the spread between a 30-year fixed and a 3-year ARM is as small as it is today, there is not much payment difference between the two (given an equivalent amortization schedule).
To put math on this:
- A $300,000, 3-year amortizing ARM carries a monthly cost of $1633.46
- A $300,000, 30-year amortizing FRM carries a monthly cost of $1703.37.
For just $70 more per month, a homeowner can lock in a steady rate and a constant payment for the long haul.
But, because the 30-year fixed carries a higher mortgage rate, it also creates a larger tax benefit. Assuming a 28% tax bracket, that added bonus is $26 monthly. Therefore, the post-tax cost of choosing the 30-year fixed rate mortgage is $44.
If you liked it at $70, you have to love it at $44.
Dan Green is an active loan officer. Email or call 513-443-2020. Dan is on Twitter at @mortgagereports.

I use Scribe to improve my blog SEO








